In September 2019, DPP legislator Chen Mingwen left a card suitcase on the high-speed rail during the election. That morning, the high-speed rail personnel found the lost property and found that there was 3 million yuan in cash, which caused heated discussions. Not only did netizens knock the bowls to watch the show, but the series even continued Chen Mingwen's "Precious Milk Terrier" who funded his son's business in the Philippines, and worked hard. . Chen Mingwen has strong political strength and is known as the "King of Chiayi". However, because the suitcase containing the money goes against the trend of digital payment in modern society, the outside world has questioned that the source of Chen Mingwen's money is not pure. The opponent, former legislator Lin Guoqing, attacked violently. Lin Guoqing was sentenced to 1.2 million yuan in compensation by the Chiayi District Court for defaming and insulting Chen Mingwen during the election.
Chen Mingwen said that the 1.2 million yuan will be donated to the nursery for public welfare. After a lengthy investigation into the 3 million high-speed rail incident, the prosecutors finally checked the four aspects of money laundering prevention and control, unknown property sources, tax collection, and property declaration, and they did not prosecute. Internet public trials often lead to guilt, but the truth after the event is always lacking. Behind the 3 million high-speed rail incident, what is the key factor in not prosecuting? Why after a large-scale investigation, the money laundering, corruption regulations or tax evasion are not prosecuted? Key 1: The source of the money is legitimate, and there is no disguise or concealment of intent Chen Mingwen once publicly stated that because his son Chen Zhengting had a need for foreign investment, he brought 3 million cash to Taipei to lend it to his son, and he accidentally lost the money. According to Article 2 of the new Law on the Prevention and Control of Money Laundering, the following three acts must be included in order to constitute the requirements for money laundering: 1. Transfer or alter specific Shadow Making proceeds of crime with the intention of disguising or concealing the source of specific proceeds of crime, or allowing others to evade criminal prosecution. 2
. Those who disguise or conceal the nature, source, whereabouts, location, ownership, disposal rights or other rights and interests of specific criminal proceeds. 3. Acceptance, possession or use of certain proceeds of crime from others. However, after a detailed investigation by the prosecutors, they summoned several passengers on the same train, high-speed train personnel, and station staff at various stations, etc., to confirm that the passengers in the carriage on that day had no specific illegal crimes, or attempted to conceal 3 million cash, so they did not use the high-speed rail. Illegal transactions were carried out in the carriage; the bank was reversely traced and withdrawn from the banknote binding belt of the remaining balance, and several clerks were summoned to testify, but no illegality was found. In addition, the relevant accounts of Chen Mingwen and his relatives were investigated, and there were no suspicious transaction records. The investigations from the above various angles were all illegal, which greatly reduced the intention of